Monday, November 17, 2008

Russia 'pinning hopes on Obama'

Russian President Dmitry Medvedev has said he hopes US President-elect Barack Obama will help rebuild the strained relations between their two countries.

In a speech in Washington, Mr Medvedev said that a new US administration might be able to address what he described as a lack of "necessary mutual trust".

He said he wanted to meet Mr Obama soon after he takes office in January.

The Russian leader also indicated that Russia might accept a compromise over a planned US missile shield in Europe.

Two weeks ago, he said Moscow would neutralise the possible deployment by the US of a tracking radar in the Czech Republic and missile interceptors in Poland by stationing short-range missiles in its western enclave of Kaliningrad.

The US insists the shield is incapable of threatening Russia and is designed solely to guard against missile attacks by "rogue states".

'Encouraged by signals'

In his speech to the Council on Foreign Relations following the G20 summit on the global economic crisis in Washington, President Medvedev welcomed the election of Mr Obama on 4 November.

"US-Russian relations lack the necessary mutual trust. We pin such hopes on the arrival of the new US administration," he explained.

We have a chance to solve the problem through either agreeing on a global [anti-missile] system or, as a minimum, to find a solution on the existing programmes which would suit the Russian Federation

Russian President Dmitry Medvedev

Mr Medvedev said Russia had a strong "strategic partnership" with China, "a very good, full-fledged, friendly exchange".

"Of course I want to have the same kind of relations with the United States," he went on.

Relations between Moscow and Washington have been particularly strained since August by Russia's war with Georgia over the breakaway regions of South Ossetia and Abkhazia.

Mr Medvedev said the first step to restoring relations would be a meeting soon after Mr Obama's inauguration, "without prevarications or preconditions".

The president also said that Russia would not be the first to escalate the situation over the plans for the US missile shield in Europe.

"We will not do anything until America takes the first step," he said.


Moscow says it will neutralise the US system with short-range missiles
Mr Medvedev said he had been encouraged by signs that Mr Obama was less enthusiastic about the shield than President George W Bush.

"[The] first signal we received shows that our partners plan to think about this programme rather than to simply rubber-stamp it," he said.

The Russian president also for the first time suggested Moscow might accept changes to the US shield plans, rather than simply their abandonment.

"We have a chance to solve the problem through either agreeing on a global system or, as a minimum, to find a solution on the existing programmes which would suit the Russian Federation," he added.


Knowing the past relationship between the United States and Russia do you believe Obama will help make it better?

Friday, November 7, 2008

Foreign Policy Problems for Obama

What do you believe will be Obama's largest foreign problems? Pick two from below and tell me why you chose them.


President-elect Barack Obama, who takes office on 20 January 2009, will face a number of key foreign policy problems. Here are 10 current challenges - and how he might tackle them.

US ROLE IN THE WORLD

One conclusion from the US vote must be that the American electorate wants a significant change in foreign policy
US troops search house in Iraq
Iraq: Obama wants most US troops out by mid-2010
from that of George W Bush.

The change might be characterised as a move from unilateralism to multilateralism - and less talk about the United States as the "world's only superpower".

Confrontation might give way to greater diplomacy.

However, US presidents, whatever the expectations, often enter or get drawn into conflicts, so nobody should expect a conflict-free presidency. President-elect Obama will enter office fighting two existing wars. How he handles them will help define his era.

IRAQ

Barack Obama says he will tell his commanders to redefine their mission as one of "successfully ending the war." But that has to be done, he says, "responsibly".

He has defined this as giving time for the Iraqi government to strengthen its own armed forces and he wants a phased withdrawal of most US troops "within 16 months" of his inauguration, which means the end of May 2010.

Potentially, this could be huge policy success for him. However, a "residual" force would remain to conduct operations against al-Qaeda in Iraq, so no complete withdrawal is envisaged.

AFGHANISTAN

Perhaps the biggest challenge on his agenda. If in Iraq the war is winding down, in Afghanistan it is winding up.

President-elect Obama is promising to "focus on Afghanistan".
Soldier and Afghan elder
Improving the situation in Afghanistan may be the toughest challenge
He has said he will send two more combat brigades. He has also promised to attack al-Qaeda figures, especially Osama Bin Laden, wherever they might be and, it seems, whether or not Pakistan agrees.

Improving the situation in Afghanistan will mean improving the performance of the Afghan government and trying to evolve a more effective policy with Pakistan (whose stability is in itself a major problem) to undermine the Taleban and al-Qaeda forces entrenched in the Pakistan border regions.

'WAR ON TERROR'

President Bush's famous phrase might be given less prominence in an Obama administration. He wants to concentrate on winning what the 9/11 Commission called "the battle of ideas" by "returning to an American foreign policy consistent with America's traditional values and by partnering with moderates within the Islamic world to counter al-Qaeda propaganda".

However, there will still be a hard edge to his policy. He has said he "will not hesitate to use military force to take out terrorists who pose a direct threat to America."

Look for two key indicators - the closure of Guantanamo Bay and the extension of the ban on torture to the CIA, which means the end of waterboarding.


There is an 'arc of crisis' to be dealt with from Turkey to Pakistan - these days that includes Syria
The president-elect's in-tray

If, or rather when, Guantanamo Bay is closed, he will have to decide what to do with the hard core that the US authorities claim remains among the 255 or so prisoners still there.

President-elect Obama has suggested using the normal US legal system to try them, but some of the evidence available under the military commissions (evidence obtained by coercion or worse) would be banned from US courts. What then?

Look also for problems in new areas of al-Qaeda activity, especially Algeria and Somalia.

IRAN

Potentially a huge crisis. Much depends on what Iran does.

If it continues with its low-grade enrichment of uranium, it could be that a new administration will simply carry on with sanctions, even trying to widen and deepen them.

An Iranian move to enrich to weapons-grade uranium would signal a step increase, in which case Israel would be urging military strikes against Iran's nuclear facilities.

The consequences of such a strike would be severe.

Barack Obama has said he will talk to Iran "without conditions", though not necessarily at presidential level in the first instance. The current Iranian leadership is unlikely to give up enrichment, so any agreement might have to include an Iranian right to some enrichment, but under strict controls.

MIDDLE EAST PEACE PROCESS

President Bush had hoped to have an agreement between the Israelis and the Palestinians by the end of this year but that looks impossible.

So Barack Obama will probably be faced with the perennial issue of how far to intervene in the peace process, such as it is, with the weight of the United States.

The first stage is the Israeli election set for 10 February, which should indicate whether there will be an Israeli government ready to make compromises.

Beyond Israel/Palestine, there is what Richard Holbrooke, a possible Secretary of State, has called an "arc of crisis" to be dealt with from Turkey to Pakistan. These days that includes Syria, whose help will be needed for the stabilisation of Iraq next door.

RUSSIA

Recent events in Georgia precipitated a crisis in relations between Russia and the West not seen since the end of the Cold War.

This encapsulated all the frustrations that have built up on both sides and raised the question of how the new administration will frame its policy towards Russia. It needs Russian help in dealing with other problems such as Iran and Darfur, where the Security Council is driving policy.
Russian soldiers on a tank
Russia's military intervention in Georgia raised the diplomatic stakes

The immediate issue is how fast to allow Georgia (and Ukraine) to advance towards the Nato membership they have been promised in principle.

Nato foreign ministers discuss this in December, and behind the scenes the Obama team will have its say. But even the Bush administration is now saying that Georgian membership is "years away", so there are opportunities here for progress with Russia.

The US anti-missile system to be installed in Poland and the Czech Republic remains a problem for Russia. Will that be slowed down?

Clues for how President-elect Obama will deal with Russia will also be seen in how he handles nuclear issues. A key one is whether the US and Russia will negotiate further reductions in nuclear weapons.

On the wider front, Barack Obama endorsed the call last year by four senior former US diplomats (including Henry Kissinger) for the US to aim for a nuclear weapons-free world, as it is supposed to be under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. How far will this be taken?

NORTH KOREA

The latest North Korean moves have been positive. The country has agreed on procedures to verify the halt in its nuclear programme in exchange for being removed from the American list of terrorist-supporting states.

But the North is likely to retain the nuclear weapons it says it has, so the issue for the next president is whether he can get North Korea to give up its weapons altogether. And who will the president be dealing with - is Kim Jong-il a well man?

CHINA

US relations with China are important across the board, since China is a permanent member of the Security Council and wields immense economic influence in the world.

China itself is not currently a problem for the US, though the future of Taiwan always has the potential to divide them and Tibet continues to be an irritant.

Over recent years, China has chosen to concentrate on domestic economic development and as long as that continues to be its priority, its relations with the US are likely to remain stable. There is no indication that Barack Obama wants anything else.

'NEW DIPLOMACY': FINANCE, CLIMATE CHANGE, ENERGY

Under this heading come the major issues that are part of what is sometimes called the new diplomacy.

The current financial crisis, in which US government money has been used to shore up the banks, will force the next president to take a more hands-on approach than presidents usually like to. And he will ask himself how to counter the diminished standing that the US, through the failure of its financial organisations, now has in the world.

Obama's handling of these new agenda problems will help determine how the US will forge a new role for itself in the world

Barack Obama has committed himself to doing more on global warming and wants greenhouse gases reduced by 80% by 2050. This will be one of the most important issues of his presidency, as the Kyoto Protocol expires in 2012 and negotiations about a follow-up have stalled.

Energy, especially the supply of oil, will be another challenge. The president-elect has pledged to eliminate US reliance on Middle East and Venezuelan oil within 10 years.

However, practically every president, going back to Jimmy Carter in 1979, says that America must use less oil and finds it hard to take action.

President-elect Obama's handling of these new agenda problems will help determine the answer to the first of these top 10 problems - how the US will forge a new role for itself in the world under his administratio

Sunday, November 2, 2008

Recession fears grip US consumers

Recession fears grip US consumers

US consumers are increasingly reluctant to spend money
Consumer spending in the US fell in September by the biggest amount in four years, the Commerce Department said.

Personal spending fell by 0.3% last month, despite a rise in incomes of 0.2%, official figures showed.

The drop in expenditure was the biggest since June 2004, and steeper than economists had predicted.

On Thursday, the Commerce Department issued figures showing the US economy shrank at an annualised rate of 0.3% between July and September.

Consumer spending accounts for two-thirds of total US economic activity.

A number of US retailers have reported falls in sales for September, including department store JC Penny, upmarket rival Saks, high street retailer American Eagle Outfitters and online retailer Target Corp.

Low cost retailers Wal-Mart and Costco also failed to meet Wall Street expectations of sales for the month.

A drop in spending had been expected, although not as steep as 0.3%.

Benign inflation

The spending report also showed that consumer inflation edged up 0.1% in September, or 0.2% excluding energy and food costs.

In a separate report, also released on Friday, the US Labour Department said wages and benefits of US workers rose 0.7% in the third quarter, the same increase recorded in the previous two quarters.

Concerns over inflation have abated somewhat prompting the Federal Reserve to seek ways to boost the economy, such as by lowering interest rates to increase borrowing.

On Wednesday, the US Federal Reserve cut its key interest rate from 1.5% to 1%, as widely expected. The relative lack of inflationary pressure in the US economy means the Fed will be able to make further cuts should it wish.

Shaky confidence

Earlier in the week, Conference Board figures showed US consumer confidence at a record low in October, amid falling global stock markets, rising property foreclosures and increasing job losses.

The board said the monthly consumer confidence index fell to 38, down from a revised 61.4 in September and below analysts' expectations of 52.

It was the lowest since the board began tracking consumer sentiment in 1967.

What effect do you believe low consumer sentiment will have on this holiday season and the economy?